Matthew T Bennett III

Matthew T Bennett III

Larkin Ingrassia PLLC

356 Meadow Avenue
Newburgh, NY 12550

Phone: 845-566-5345

Website: 845law.com

General Member

About Matthew T Bennett III

Matthew T. Bennett III joined the law firm of Larkin Ingrassia, PLLC in September 2023 as an associate in the Criminal Law Department. He earned his J.D. from Roger Williams University School of Law, in Bristol, Rhode Island. He also attended King’s College in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, where he received a B.A. in Political Science, summa cum laude. Matt, a Monroe-Woodbury alum, served the communities in Sullivan and Orange Counties as an Assistant District Attorney for more than four years. Matt has tried various cases to verdict, including trials before a jury, for crimes such as attempted murder; narcotics possession; and driving while intoxicated. He has also worked as a criminal defense attorney at another prominent Orange County law firm. Matt is admitted to practice in the states of New York and Arizona (inactive).


Contact Matthew T Bennett III

Provide some details about your situation, but remember not to include sensitive information. An attorney-client relationship is only formed once an attorney formally agrees to represent you.

Your Name *

Phone Number

Email Address

Message *

Find an Attorney

Enter your city, state, or Zip code below to locate a qualified attorney who has demonstrated a commitment to defend those accused of DUI and related crimes.

FIND AN ATTORNEYSearch
journal

NCDD Journal

Find the latest news and announcements in our journal.

FROM OUR BLOG

Interview With an Amicus

06/27/2025

Written by Michelle L. Behan Amicus Curiae (Latin for "Friend of the Court") refers to a brief that is filed by an interested, non-party to the matter under consideration. This is often done in cases where organizations and entities wish to provide the reviewing court with their point of view, be it social or public policy implications, or special interest agendas....

Keeping FSTs Out of a Trial

04/23/2025

Written by Neil Halttunen I want to address a common issue that DWI practitioners are facing, trying to keep FSTs out of a trial. One way is to take the position that FSTs are scientific evidence and make the prosecutor lay scientific foundation which they rarely can do. The HGN test was the result of several studies. See Generally Session 8 of...

Back to Top