Steven M. Vaillancourt

Steven M. Vaillancourt

Respected, Resilient and Relentless

Law Offices of Steven M. Vaillancourt

279 Main Street
Fitchburg, MA 01420

Phone: 978-353-8608

Website: vaillancourtlaw.com

SS CertifiedGeneral Member

About Steven M. Vaillancourt

For over 25 years, Attorney Vaillancourt has been SUCCESSFULLY representing people accused of Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol in both Massachusetts and New Hampshire. As one of the lead counsel in the landmark Ananias litigation, which halted the use of breath testing in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for years, Attorney Vaillancourt is a well-known and highly respected member of the bar who prides himself on offering the very best defense available to those charged with drinking and driving.


Contact Steven M. Vaillancourt

Provide some details about your situation, but remember not to include sensitive information. An attorney-client relationship is only formed once an attorney formally agrees to represent you.

Your Name *

Phone Number

Email Address

Message *

Find an Attorney

Enter your city, state, or Zip code below to locate a qualified attorney who has demonstrated a commitment to defend those accused of DUI and related crimes.

FIND AN ATTORNEYSearch
journal

NCDD Journal

Find the latest news and announcements in our journal.

FROM OUR BLOG

Oral Fluid Testing: Roadside vs. Evidential Analyses

09/02/2025

Written by Ashley M. Hart As cannabis is being decriminalized in many states, there has been increased interest in rapid roadside tests to detect THC and other substances for intoxicated driving charges. A majority of states now have oral fluid testing in some form: roadside (presumptive) or evidential (confirmed in a lab). These states include Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Connecticut,...

Interview With an Amicus

06/27/2025

Written by Michelle L. Behan Amicus Curiae (Latin for "Friend of the Court") refers to a brief that is filed by an interested, non-party to the matter under consideration. This is often done in cases where organizations and entities wish to provide the reviewing court with their point of view, be it social or public policy implications, or special interest agendas....

Back to Top